7.0 KiB
Brand Guidelines Output Template
The complete structure for generated brand voice guidelines. Fill each section based on discovered and analyzed sources. The following is a raw markdown template — copy and fill the sections below. Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders.
[Company Name] Brand Voice Guidelines
Generation Metadata
- Created: [date]
- Version: [N] (incremented from previous if updating)
- Replaces: [previous version date, if applicable]
- Sources: [list of documents and/or conversations analyzed]
- Documents processed: [N]
- Conversations analyzed: [N]
- Discovery report used: [Yes/No]
- Overall confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph overview of the brand voice. What makes this brand distinctive? What is the core personality? How should content feel to the reader?]
We Are / We Are Not
The foundational brand identity anchor. Voice is constant — it doesn't change by channel or audience.
| We Are | We Are Not |
|---|---|
| [Attribute 1] — [brief description] | [Counter 1] — [what to avoid] |
| [Attribute 2] — [brief description] | [Counter 2] — [what to avoid] |
| [Attribute 3] — [brief description] | [Counter 3] — [what to avoid] |
| [Attribute 4] — [brief description] | [Counter 4] — [what to avoid] |
| [Attribute 5] — [brief description] | [Counter 5] — [what to avoid] |
Voice Attributes Detail
For each "We Are" attribute:
[Attribute 1]: [Name]
- What it means: [detailed description]
- How it shows up: [specific behaviors in content]
- What to avoid: [the "We Are Not" counterpart, expanded]
- Evidence: [source quote or pattern, with citation]
- Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
[Repeat for each attribute]
Brand Personality
- Archetype: [e.g., "The Expert Friend" — technically deep but never condescending]
- If our brand were a person: [brief personality sketch]
- Core values expressed in voice: [list]
Messaging Framework
Primary Value Proposition
[Core value statement — one sentence]
Variations observed:
- "[Variation 1]" (Source: [doc])
- "[Variation 2]" (Source: [doc])
Key Message Pillars
-
[Pillar Name]
- Core idea: [one sentence]
- When to use: [contexts]
- Example phrasing: "[quote]"
- Frequency in conversations: [X]% (if transcript data available)
- Effectiveness: [High/Medium/Low] (if outcome data available)
-
[Pillar Name] [same format]
-
[Pillar Name] [same format]
Competitive Positioning
- vs. [Competitor A]: [how we differentiate]
- vs. [Competitor B]: [how we differentiate]
- vs. Status Quo: [why change is worth it]
Tone-by-Context Matrix
Voice is constant. Tone flexes by context. These three dimensions adjust:
| Context | Formality | Energy | Technical Depth | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold outreach | Medium | High | Low | Hook fast, earn attention |
| Discovery calls | Medium | Medium-High | Medium | Ask more than tell |
| Demo / presentation | Medium-High | High | High | Show, don't just describe |
| Enterprise proposal | High | Medium | High | ROI and precision |
| Follow-up email | Medium | Medium | Low-Medium | Add new value each touch |
| Social media | Low-Medium | High | Low | Brevity and personality |
| Customer success | Medium | Warm | Medium | Empathy and competence |
| Internal comms | Low | Medium | Varies | Authentic, less polished |
Context-Specific Guidelines
Cold Outreach
- Overall tone: [description]
- Opening approach: [what works]
- Do's: [list]
- Don'ts: [list]
- Example: "[sample opening line]"
Discovery Calls
[same structure]
Proposals & RFPs
[same structure]
Social Media
[same structure]
Terminology Guide
Must-Use Terms
| Term | Usage | Instead Of | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| [term] | [when/how to use] | [what it replaces] | "[in a sentence]" |
Preferred Terms
| Term | Usage | Example |
|---|---|---|
| [term] | [guidance] | "[in a sentence]" |
Avoid These Terms
| Term | Reason | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| [term] | [why to avoid] | [what to use instead] |
Never-Use Terms
| Term | Reason |
|---|---|
| [term] | [why this is prohibited] |
Language That Works
Ranked by effectiveness (from conversation analysis, if available):
Top Phrases
- "[Phrase]" — Context: [when to use], Why it works: [analysis]
- "[Phrase]" — Context: [when to use], Why it works: [analysis]
Questions That Engage
- "[Question]" — Leads to: [typical outcome]
- "[Question]" — Leads to: [typical outcome]
Objection Handling Patterns
- Objection: "[common objection]" Response pattern: "[how top performers respond]" Why it works: [analysis]
Language to Avoid
Anti-Patterns
- "[Phrase/pattern]" — Problem: [what happens], Better: "[alternative]"
- "[Phrase/pattern]" — Problem: [what happens], Better: "[alternative]"
Content Examples
Excellent Examples
[Full example with annotation explaining what makes it on-brand]
Examples to Avoid
[Full example with annotation explaining what's off-brand and how to fix it]
Confidence Scores
| Section | Confidence | Basis | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voice Attributes | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Messaging Framework | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Tone Matrix | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Terminology | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Language Patterns | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
Open Questions for Team Discussion
High Priority (blocks guideline completion)
- [Question Title]
- What was found: [description of ambiguity]
- Agent recommendation: [suggested resolution]
- Need from you: [specific decision]
Medium Priority (improves quality)
[same format]
Low Priority (nice to have)
[same format]
Data Gaps & Recommendations
[What's missing and specific actions to fill gaps]
- [Gap 1]: [recommendation to fill it]
- [Gap 2]: [recommendation to fill it]
Appendix: Sources
| # | Source | Platform | Type | Date | Key Sections Used | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [title] | [platform] | [AUTHORITATIVE/OPERATIONAL/etc.] | [date] | [sections] | [H/M/L] |
Template Usage Notes
- Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders
- If transcript data is unavailable, omit the "Language That Works" and "Language to Avoid" sections
- If only documents are available (no transcripts), note this in metadata
- "We Are / We Are Not" table should have minimum 4 rows, ideally 5-7
- Tone matrix should cover at minimum: cold outreach, proposals, social media
- All examples must have source attribution
- Every open question must include an agent recommendation