chore: sync skills/guideline-generation/references/guideline-template.md for v1.2.1

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-01 13:03:18 -05:00
parent af9ddf5f3e
commit b451e091e8
@@ -1,27 +1,60 @@
# Brand Guidelines Output Template
The complete structure for generated brand voice guidelines. Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders.
The complete structure for generated brand voice guidelines. Fill each section based on discovered and analyzed sources. The following is a raw markdown template — copy and fill the sections below. Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders.
# [Company Name] Brand Voice Guidelines
## Generation Metadata
- Created: [date]
- Version: [N]
- Version: [N] (incremented from previous if updating)
- Replaces: [previous version date, if applicable]
- Sources: [list of documents and/or conversations analyzed]
- Documents processed: [N]
- Conversations analyzed: [N]
- Discovery report used: [Yes/No]
- Overall confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
---
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs: what makes this brand distinctive, core personality, how content should feel]
[2-3 paragraph overview of the brand voice. What makes this brand distinctive?
What is the core personality? How should content feel to the reader?]
---
## We Are / We Are Not
The foundational brand identity anchor. Voice is constant — it doesn't change by channel or audience.
| We Are | We Are Not |
|--------|------------|
| **[Attribute]** — [description] | **[Counter]** — [what to avoid] |
| **[Attribute 1]** — [brief description] | **[Counter 1]** — [what to avoid] |
| **[Attribute 2]** — [brief description] | **[Counter 2]** — [what to avoid] |
| **[Attribute 3]** — [brief description] | **[Counter 3]** — [what to avoid] |
| **[Attribute 4]** — [brief description] | **[Counter 4]** — [what to avoid] |
| **[Attribute 5]** — [brief description] | **[Counter 5]** — [what to avoid] |
### Voice Attributes Detail
For each "We Are" attribute:
#### [Attribute 1]: [Name]
- **What it means**: [detailed description]
- **How it shows up**: [specific behaviors in content]
- **What to avoid**: [the "We Are Not" counterpart, expanded]
- **Evidence**: [source quote or pattern, with citation]
- **Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low]
[Repeat for each attribute]
---
## Brand Personality
- **Archetype**: [e.g., "The Expert Friend" — technically deep but never condescending]
- **If our brand were a person**: [brief personality sketch]
- **Core values expressed in voice**: [list]
---
@@ -30,67 +63,179 @@ The complete structure for generated brand voice guidelines. Omit sections with
### Primary Value Proposition
[Core value statement — one sentence]
Variations observed:
- "[Variation 1]" (Source: [doc])
- "[Variation 2]" (Source: [doc])
### Key Message Pillars
1. **[Pillar Name]**
- Core idea: [one sentence]
- When to use: [contexts]
- Example phrasing: "[quote]"
- Frequency in conversations: [X]% (if transcript data available)
- Effectiveness: [High/Medium/Low] (if outcome data available)
2. **[Pillar Name]**
[same format]
3. **[Pillar Name]**
[same format]
### Competitive Positioning
- vs. [Competitor A]: [how we differentiate]
- vs. [Competitor B]: [how we differentiate]
- vs. Status Quo: [why change is worth it]
---
## Tone-by-Context Matrix
Voice is constant. Tone flexes by context. These three dimensions adjust:
| Context | Formality | Energy | Technical Depth | Key Principle |
|---------|-----------|--------|-----------------|---------------|
| Cold outreach | Medium | High | Low | Hook fast, earn attention |
| Discovery calls | Medium | Medium-High | Medium | Ask more than tell |
| Demo / presentation | Medium-High | High | High | Show, don't just describe |
| Enterprise proposal | High | Medium | High | ROI and precision |
| Follow-up email | Medium | Medium | Low-Medium | Add new value each touch |
| Social media | Low-Medium | High | Low | Brevity and personality |
| Customer success | Medium | Warm | Medium | Empathy and competence |
| Internal comms | Low | Medium | Varies | Authentic, less polished |
### Context-Specific Guidelines
#### Cold Outreach
- **Overall tone**: [description]
- **Opening approach**: [what works]
- **Do's**: [list]
- **Don'ts**: [list]
- **Example**: "[sample opening line]"
#### Discovery Calls
[same structure]
#### Proposals & RFPs
[same structure]
#### Social Media
[same structure]
---
## Terminology Guide
### Must-Use Terms
| Term | Instead Of |
|------|------------|
| [term] | [what it replaces] |
| Term | Usage | Instead Of | Example |
|------|-------|------------|---------|
| [term] | [when/how to use] | [what it replaces] | "[in a sentence]" |
### Preferred Terms
| Term | Usage | Example |
|------|-------|---------|
| [term] | [guidance] | "[in a sentence]" |
### Avoid These Terms
| Term | Alternative |
|------|-------------|
| [term] | [what to use instead] |
| Term | Reason | Alternative |
|------|--------|-------------|
| [term] | [why to avoid] | [what to use instead] |
### Never-Use Terms
| Term | Reason |
|------|--------|
| [term] | [why this is prohibited] |
---
## Language That Works
Ranked by effectiveness (from conversation analysis, if available):
### Top Phrases
1. **"[Phrase]"** — Context: [when to use], Why it works: [analysis]
2. **"[Phrase]"** — Context: [when to use], Why it works: [analysis]
### Questions That Engage
1. **"[Question]"** — Leads to: [typical outcome]
2. **"[Question]"** — Leads to: [typical outcome]
### Objection Handling Patterns
1. **Objection**: "[common objection]"
**Response pattern**: "[how top performers respond]"
**Why it works**: [analysis]
---
## Language to Avoid
### Anti-Patterns
1. **"[Phrase/pattern]"** — Problem: [what happens], Better: "[alternative]"
2. **"[Phrase/pattern]"** — Problem: [what happens], Better: "[alternative]"
---
## Content Examples
### Excellent Examples
[Full example with annotation explaining what makes it on-brand]
### Examples to Avoid
[Full example with annotation explaining what's off-brand and how to fix it]
---
## Confidence Scores
| Section | Confidence | Basis |
|---------|------------|-------|
| Voice Attributes | [H/M/L] | [why] |
| Messaging Framework | [H/M/L] | [why] |
| Tone Matrix | [H/M/L] | [why] |
| Terminology | [H/M/L] | [why] |
| Section | Confidence | Basis | Sources |
|---------|------------|-------|---------|
| Voice Attributes | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Messaging Framework | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Tone Matrix | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Terminology | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
| Language Patterns | [H/M/L] | [why] | [N sources] |
---
## Open Questions for Team Discussion
### High Priority
### High Priority (blocks guideline completion)
1. **[Question Title]**
- What was found: [description]
- Recommendation: [suggested resolution]
- What was found: [description of ambiguity]
- Agent recommendation: [suggested resolution]
- Need from you: [specific decision]
### Medium Priority (improves quality)
[same format]
### Low Priority (nice to have)
[same format]
---
## Data Gaps & Recommendations
[What's missing and specific actions to fill gaps]
- [ ] [Gap 1]: [recommendation to fill it]
- [ ] [Gap 2]: [recommendation to fill it]
---
## Appendix: Sources
| # | Source | Type | Date | Confidence |
|---|--------|------|------|------------|
| 1 | [title] | [AUTHORITATIVE/STRONG SIGNAL/etc.] | [date] | [H/M/L] |
| # | Source | Platform | Type | Date | Key Sections Used | Confidence |
|---|--------|----------|------|------|-------------------|------------|
| 1 | [title] | [platform] | [AUTHORITATIVE/OPERATIONAL/etc.] | [date] | [sections] | [H/M/L] |
---
## Template Usage Notes
- Omit sections with no data rather than including empty placeholders
- If transcript data is unavailable, omit the "Language That Works" and "Language to Avoid" sections
- If only documents are available (no transcripts), note this in metadata
- "We Are / We Are Not" table should have minimum 4 rows, ideally 5-7
- Tone matrix should cover at minimum: cold outreach, proposals, social media
- All examples must have source attribution
- Every open question must include an agent recommendation