Add example: taxonomy recommendations CSV
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
proposal_id,status,proposed_label,parent,reason,candidate_sources,notes
|
||||
TAX-001,confirmed_existing,Clients/Resellers/Acme-Transit,Clients/Resellers,Base reseller label by participant domain,acme-transit.com,Domain presence in from/to/cc is enough — no subject qualifier needed
|
||||
TAX-002,confirmed_existing,Clients/Resellers/Metro-Rail,Clients/Resellers,Base reseller label by participant domain,metro-rail.com,Domain presence in from/to/cc is enough
|
||||
TAX-003,proposed_new,Finance/Purchase-Orders,Finance,PO/WO documents need their own label distinct from Sales/PO,Apps Script attachment scan,Use attachment filename pattern for classification
|
||||
TAX-004,policy_note,participant-domain base labels,,Reseller/client labels should be additive,All reseller scans,"Even if Sales/Finance/Support applies, preserve reseller label"
|
||||
TAX-005,policy_note,secondary work-type labels,,Sales/Finance/Support labels need tight keyword/attachment signals,All reseller scans,Do not use reseller domain alone for work-type labels
|
||||
TAX-006,do_not_automate_yet,end-customer domains,,End-customer domains must not receive reseller label unless reseller participant exists,Manual review,"Flag with ! Rule Needed if pattern repeats — may need Studio flow for context evaluation"
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user